Where translation stops being transcription
Ten Greek words translators can’t agree on.
Ten Greek words can make a familiar Odyssey strange again. Each appears in a vivid moment—a trick, a homecoming, a stranger at the door, a sea that refuses to be simply blue—and each has forced translators to choose what to keep. The Greek stays the same; the English options are different translators’ answers. Read them side by side and the poem starts to sound less fixed, more alive.
οἶνοψ πόντος
oinops pontos wine-faced seaπλέων ἐπὶ οἴνοπα πόντον ἐπʼ ἀλλοθρόους ἀνθρώπους,
Odyssey 1.183
Why does Homer call the sea “wine-dark”? The phrase is famous because it sounds strange in English, and no translation makes the puzzle disappear. οἶνοψ links wine with the sea’s appearance without supplying one tidy colour. Palmer, Murray, and Johnston keep “wine-dark.” Bryant gives us a “dark blue deep,” while Cowper leaves colour behind for a “gloomy flood.” Segalá keeps the wine image in Spanish; Voß gives only a dark sea. Each choice gives up something different: Homer’s unsettling image, a clearer picture, or the water’s threatening mood. The phrase lasts because it asks us to see the sea through an image we cannot quite settle.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Palmer (1891)“wine-dark sea”
- Murray (1919)“wine-dark sea”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“wine-dark sea”
- Cowper (1791)“Athwart the gloomy flood”
- Bryant (1871)“across the dark blue deep”
- Pope (1726)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Chapman (1616)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Hobbes (1675)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Morris (1887)“o’er the wine-dark sea”
- Worsley (1861)“o’er the wine-dark sea”
- Cotterill (1911)“Sailing the wine-dark deep”
- Johnston (2002)“sailing across the wine-dark sea”
Beyond English
- Voß (1781)“Über das dunkle Meer”
- Leconte de Lisle (1893)“la noire mer”
- Segalá (1910)“el vinoso ponto”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.183 · LSJ, s.v. οἶνοψ · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. οἶνοψ
μῆτις
metis cunning intelligence; resourceful counselὡς ὄνομʼ ἐξαπάτησεν ἐμὸν καὶ μῆτις ἀμύμων.
Odyssey 9.414
In the Cyclops’ cave, μῆτις is intelligence that works through timing, planning, and knowing what another person will hear. Polyphemus cries that Οὖτις, “Nobody,” is killing him at 9.408. His neighbours answer at 9.410 that if μή τίς, “no one,” is attacking him, they cannot help. At 9.414 Odysseus names the power behind the escape: his μῆτις, joined to his false name. Butler calls it a “clever stratagem,” Murray a “cunning device,” and Chapman makes it “wit / And name.” The choice matters: was the triumph the plan, the wordplay, or Odysseus’s quick mind? Homer makes it all three at once.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“clever stratagem”
- Palmer (1891)“my name, that clever notion”
- Murray (1919)“my name and cunning device”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“my name and cunning counsel”
- Cowper (1791)“Slight stratagem!”
- Bryant (1871)“my shrewd device”
- Pope (1726)“effect of conduct and of art”
- Chapman (1616)“my wit And name deceiv’d him”
- Hobbes (1675)“with my name the mighty clown I so deceived had, and gull’d by craft”
- Morris (1887)“my name that had so beguiled him and my worthy rede”
- Worsley (1861)“the shrewd illusion”
- Cotterill (1911)“Nobody name of my faultless cunning”
- Johnston (2002)“my cunning name had pulled off such a trick”
Beyond English
- Voß (1781)“mein trefflicher Einfall”
- Leconte de Lisle (1893)“ma ruse irréprochable”
- Segalá (1910)“mi excelente artificio”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 9.408-414 · LSJ, s.v. μῆτις · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. μῆτις
πολύτροπος
polytropos much-turning; versatileἄνδρα μοι ἔννεπε, μοῦσα, πολύτροπον, ὃς μάλα πολλὰ
Odyssey 1.1
The Odyssey’s first description of Odysseus makes him hard to pin down. πολύτροπος suggests a man of many turns or many ways, but does not settle whether those are journeys, shifts of mind, or stratagems. Butler’s “ingenious” makes him inventive; Johnston’s “resourceful” makes him practical; Morris’s “Shifty” gives him a more suspicious cast. Murray’s “man of many devices” chooses tactical intelligence while keeping the sense plural. No one English adjective carries every possibility. Before Odysseus has done anything on the page, the Greek opens a question that the poem keeps testing: how should we value a hero whose great strength is his ability to change his approach?
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“ingenious hero”
- Palmer (1891)“adventurous man”
- Murray (1919)“man of many devices”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“man, so ready at need”
- Cowper (1791)“for shrewdness famed And genius versatile”
- Bryant (1871)“sagacious man”
- Pope (1726)“wisdom’s various arts renown’d”
- Chapman (1616)“Wound with his wisdom”
- Hobbes (1675)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Morris (1887)“the Shifty”
- Worsley (1861)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Cotterill (1911)“man so wary and wise”
- Johnston (2002)“resourceful man”
Beyond English
- Voß (1781)“vielgewanderten Mannes”
- Leconte de Lisle (1893)“cet homme subtil”
- Segalá (1910)“varón de multiforme ingenio”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.1 · LSJ, s.v. πολύτροπος · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. πολύτροπος
νόστος
nostos return home; homecomingἀρνύμενος ἥν τε ψυχὴν καὶ νόστον ἑταίρων.
Odyssey 1.5
At the poem’s opening, νόστος names the return Odysseus is trying to win for his companions: not travel in the right direction, but arrival home after dangerous absence. Butler turns it into action, “bring his men safely home”; Murray makes it “the return of his comrades”; Pope imagines reaching a “natal shore.” The modern word “nostalgia” is still with us, but it is a later learned coinage combining νόστος with ἄλγος, “pain.” Homeric νόστος itself means homecoming, not the modern feeling of nostalgia. That difference matters because a return in the Odyssey can be delayed, damaged, denied, or achieved at terrible cost.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“bring his men safely home”
- Palmer (1891)“men’s safe return”
- Murray (1919)“the return of his comrades”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“the return of his company”
- Cowper (1791)“conduct His followers to their home”
- Bryant (1871)“bring back His comrades to their homes”
- Pope (1726)“Safe with his friends to gain his natal shore”
- Chapman (1616)“friends in their retreat for home”
- Hobbes (1675)“bring home his crew”
- Morris (1887)“fellow-farers’ return”
- Worsley (1861)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Cotterill (1911)“bring home safely his comrades”
- Johnston (2002)“lead his comrades home”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.5 · LSJ, s.v. νόστος · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. νόστος · OED, s.v. nostalgia
ξεῖνος
xeinos guest; strangerξεῖνοί τε πτωχοί τε· δόσις δʼ ὀλίγη τε φίλη τε
Odyssey 14.58
At Eumaeus’s door, a ξεῖνος is the person who may be both stranger and guest before anyone knows where he belongs. English usually forces the choice too soon. Butler says “strangers and beggars,” Cotterill says “Beggars and guests,” and Morris joins “guests and bedesmen.” The same Greek root is still with us in “xeno-” and “xenophobia,” words that stress the outsider; Homer’s word can also name someone owed food, shelter, and protection. Eumaeus grounds that duty in Zeus, so insulting a vulnerable visitor is more than bad manners. Translate only “guest” and the risk of the unknown fades; translate only “stranger” and so does the duty to welcome.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“all strangers and beggars are from Jove”
- Palmer (1891)“in the charge of Zeus all strangers and beggars stand”
- Murray (1919)“from Zeus are all strangers and beggars”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“from Zeus are all strangers and beggars”
- Cowper (1791)“all the strangers are the care of Jove”
- Bryant (1871)“strangers and the poor are sent By Jove”
- Pope (1726)“’Tis Jove that sends the stranger and the poor”
- Chapman (1616)“Poor men, and unplac’d In free seats of their own, are all from Jove”
- Hobbes (1675)“The poor and stranger are in God’s hand ever”
- Morris (1887)“guests and bedesmen all, From Zeus they are”
- Worsley (1861)“All strangers and all poor by Zeus are brought”
- Cotterill (1911)“’Tis Zeus our Father that sendeth Beggars and guests”
- Johnston (2002)“for every guest and beggar comes from Zeus”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 14.57-58 · LSJ, s.v. ξένος · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. ξεῖνος
ψυχή
psyche life-breath; soul or shadeἀστραγάλων ἐάγη, ψυχὴ δʼ Ἄϊδόσδε κατῆλθε.
Odyssey 11.65
Elpenor tells Odysseus how a drunken fall broke his neck and his ψυχή went down to Hades. English “psyche” comes from this Greek word, but Homer is not describing a modern inner self. Translators make what leaves the body a “soul,” a “spirit,” or a “shade”; Hobbes tells the fall without naming it separately. Each choice brings a different picture of death. “Soul” can suggest a whole person continuing, while “shade” sounds thinner and diminished. Yet Elpenor can speak, remember, and plead for burial. The scene keeps him recognisably present while making the loss of bodily life impossible to ignore.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“my soul came down to the house of Hades”
- Palmer (1891)“my soul came down to the house of Hades”
- Murray (1919)“my spirit went down to the house of Hades”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“my spirit went down to the house of Hades”
- Cowper (1791)“my spirit sought the shades”
- Bryant (1871)“my soul went down To Hades”
- Pope (1726)“my soul descends to hell”
- Chapman (1616)“My soul thus visit this infernal shade”
- Hobbes (1675)— Elpenor’s descent is narrated without a separate English equivalent for ψυχή.
- Morris (1887)“unto Hades and his house my soul must fare”
- Worsley (1861)“my soul in Hades refuge found”
- Cotterill (1911)“my spirit departed to Hades”
- Johnston (2002)“My shade departed, and went down to Hades”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 11.65 · LSJ, s.v. ψυχή · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. ψυχή
κλέος
kleos fame; report or renownἀνθρώποισι μέλω, καί μευ κλέος οὐρανὸν ἵκει.
Odyssey 9.20
When Odysseus finally names himself, he boasts that his κλέος reaches heaven. κλέος can mean fame or report: a reputation that people hear and pass on. Butler and Murray choose “fame,” Morris raises it to “glory,” and Worsley gives the more unsettled “rumour.” Chapman makes the deeds themselves audible: his “facts ... resound.” These are not merely different levels of praise. They change whether we hear a hero honoured for what he did or a name growing because people keep talking. The Odyssey knows that stories make a reputation as well as preserve one, and that the version which survives may never be the whole person.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“my fame ascends to heaven”
- Palmer (1891)“my renown reaches to heaven”
- Murray (1919)“my fame reaches unto heaven”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“my fame reaches unto heaven”
- Cowper (1791)“renown'd to heaven”
- Bryant (1871)“my fame Hath reached to heaven”
- Pope (1726)“high heaven my fame”
- Chapman (1616)“my facts as high as heav’n resound”
- Hobbes (1675)“known I am by fame up to the skies”
- Morris (1887)“my glory to the heavens aloft doth speed”
- Worsley (1861)“my rumour to the skies hath gone”
- Cotterill (1911)“the fame of it reacheth to heaven”
- Johnston (2002)“my fame stretches all the way to heaven”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 9.20 · LSJ, s.v. κλέος · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. κλέος
θυμός
thymos heart; inner driveπολλὰ δʼ ὅ γʼ ἐν πόντῳ πάθεν ἄλγεα ὃν κατὰ θυμόν,
Odyssey 1.4
As Odysseus suffers at sea, Homer says the pain is in his θυμός. “Heart” is often the nearest English choice, but the word can name a person’s active inner life: feeling, desire, resolve, or thought. Murray and Cotterill use “heart,” Palmer’s “own breast” makes the suffering bodily, and Johnston chooses “spirit.” Several translators simply say that Odysseus suffers. Later, θυμός can be stirred, restrained, or made to deliberate, without laying out one fixed theory of the mind or body. Greek keeps this inner life responsive and physical; English usually divides the work among heart, mind, soul, and will.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Palmer (1891)“many a pang he bore in his own breast”
- Murray (1919)“woes he suffered in his heart”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“woes he suffered in his heart”
- Cowper (1791)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Bryant (1871)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Pope (1726)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Chapman (1616)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Hobbes (1675)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Morris (1887)“Many a grief of heart”
- Worsley (1861)“a weight of sorrows in the deep Brooding he bore”
- Cotterill (1911)“Many a woe he endured in his heart”
- Johnston (2002)“his spirit suffered many torments”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.4 · LSJ, s.v. θυμός · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. θυμός
ἀτασθαλίη
atasthaliē wild recklessness; ruinous follyαὐτῶν γὰρ σφετέρῃσιν ἀτασθαλίῃσιν ὄλοντο,
Odyssey 1.7
The crew’s destruction is not presented as one unlucky mistake. ἀτασθαλίη names reckless, self-willed behaviour that helps bring ruin on the people who choose it. Johnston’s “stupidity” sounds blunt and everyday; Butler’s “sheer folly” is more tragic; Pope’s “impious folly” makes the offence religious; Hobbes’s “insolence” makes it defiant. The form in this line is plural, and the plural can present the disaster as the result of reckless acts rather than one neutral mistake. The gods still shape events, but the poem’s opening gives the men a share in their own loss. Translation decides how sharply we hear that blame.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)“their own sheer folly”
- Palmer (1891)“their own perversity”
- Murray (1919)“their own blind folly”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“the blindness of their own hearts”
- Cowper (1791)“self-destroy'd By their own fault; infatuate!”
- Bryant (1871)“Through their own folly”
- Pope (1726)“their impious folly”
- Chapman (1616)“their own impieties”
- Hobbes (1675)“their own insolence”
- Morris (1887)“their own souls’ folly”
- Worsley (1861)“their own foolishness, Self-blinded”
- Cotterill (1911)“their own act of infatuate madness”
- Johnston (2002)“their own stupidity”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.7 · LSJ, s.v. ἀτασθαλία · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. ἀτασθαλίη
ἀμύμων
amymōn blameless; faultlessμνήσατο γὰρ κατὰ θυμὸν ἀμύμονος Αἰγίσθοιο,
Odyssey 1.29
Zeus remembers Aegisthus with ἀμύμων, a praising word often rendered “blameless,” then immediately explains why Aegisthus is to blame. He took Agamemnon’s wife, killed him on his return, and ignored a divine warning about the revenge to come. Worsley keeps the shock with “Blameless Ægisthus.” Palmer softens it to “gentle,” Murray and others choose “noble,” and several translators leave the word out. Chapman goes the other way with “Faultful Ægisthus,” making the local judgment explicit. The mismatch shows how a familiar heroic label can rub against the scene around it. Translation must either preserve that tension, smooth it, or resolve it for the reader.
How the English translations in Skald render it here
- Butler (1900)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Palmer (1891)“gentle Aegisthus”
- Murray (1919)“noble Aegisthus”
- Butcher & Lang (1879)“noble Aegisthus”
- Cowper (1791)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Bryant (1871)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Pope (1726)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Chapman (1616)“Faultful Ægisthus”
- Hobbes (1675)— No separate English equivalent appears in the chunk containing this line.
- Morris (1887)“Ægisthus the noble one”
- Worsley (1861)“Blameless Ægisthus”
- Cotterill (1911)“the noble Aegisthus”
- Johnston (2002)“royal Aegisthus”
Sources: Homer, Odyssey 1.29-43 · LSJ, s.v. ἀμύμων · Cunliffe, A Lexicon of the Homeric Dialect, s.v. ἀμύμων
Read them in place.
Skald shows every one of these words in its own line, beside the Greek and all twenty-four translations.